[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Sharded FSFS repositories - summary

From: <philipp.marek_at_bmlv.gv.at>
Date: 2007-03-18 14:02:46 CET

> > So, I'd rather we just hard-code a setting that works: if an admin
> > wants to change the #define, they can - but they have to dork with the
> > source to do so. -- justin
> I mentioned it only because the idea had been tossed out there
> initially. I much prefer one less knob to turn, and one less concern to
> have about the configuration of people's repositories.
Well, I think that it's not necessarily true that "one size fits all", so I'd
like that configurable - along with the levels. (To repeat myself once more ;-)

But here's a bit more food for thought: If we kept the number of entries per
directory small, we could fit the rev-props file there, too. So there'd be no
need for a duplicate directory structure.
Whether that makes sense, I'm not sure - the rev-props are typically very small,
so another filesystem for them might be better.

Well, there're arguments for and against everything.
Either you say how's it done, or we could take a poll.



To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sun Mar 18 14:03:51 2007

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.