Re: [merge-tracking] 'svn blame' auditing

On Thu, 22 Feb 2007, Giovanni Bajo wrote:

> On 21/02/2007 19.32, Hyrum K. Wright wrote:
>
> >I've decided to investigate what needs to be done to implement 'svn
> >blame' auditing support. For those unfamiliar with the problem, the use
> >case is simple. Quoting [1]: "If you merge rN into a branch B, and rN
> >was committed by author A, then svn blame should show the changed lines
> >in B as last touched by A, even if the merge was committed by you and
> >you are not A. This must also work when merging a range of revisions
> >with different authors."
>
> I may be stating the obvious, but you probably want to be shown both the
> original commit author *and* revision number.

Yup. I updated the requirements doc today; hopefully this is better
captured now.