On Tue, 23 Jan 2007, Kouhei Sutou wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 2007/1/23, Daniel Rall <dlr@collab.net>:
>
> >There's no regression to the Perl bindings, only an incomplete
> >addition of functionality. Whether the incomplete changes causes a
> >problem to the Ruby bindings, I don't know for certain. I do know
> >that all the tests pass, but as we saw with the Perl bindings, this
> >may not be a sufficient measuring stick.
> >
> >Kou (or someone else familiar with the Ruby bindings), can you take a
> >look at the state of the Ruby bindings in the 1.4.3 tarball, and give
> >us a thumbs up or down?
>
> The state becamed better.
>
> Tha changes affected Svn::Ra::Session#status{,2} and
> Svn::Ra::Session#switch{,2}. And there are no tests for them. So, I tested
> them now and noticed they were buggy. I confirmed that the changes also
> fix bugs of the Ruby bindings.
>
>
> # I'll add test for them to trunk later.
Thanks Kou, that's great news!
I'm in favor of following the plan suggested by Max (others?) in the
previous 1.4.3 thread -- complete testing on the 1.4.3 tarball (we
only need one more Windows sig to release it, which IIUC Lieven will
be providing). Get some more fixes into the 1.4.x branch, and release
a 1.4.4 in a week or two (clkao wanted to make some more Perl bindings
fixes, too?).
- Dan
- application/pgp-signature attachment: stored
Received on Tue Jan 23 05:01:37 2007