On Tue, Jan 02, 2007 at 12:49:52PM -0800, Daniel Rall wrote:
> > WDYT? -- justin
> I'm in favor of this backport. With ra_serf not yet built by default,
> and all the changes in this diff contained within the
> subversion/libsvn_ra_serf/ directory, this is a very low-risk change
> which has the upside of potentially getting more testing of ra_serf by
> adventurous users who build it themselves.
+1. While this is a feature rather than a bugfix, ra_serf is only going
to be used by people actively trying to test that feature. Providing a
packaged release with the latest ra_serf code is IMO a good idea.
Received on Tue Jan 2 21:53:56 2007
- application/pgp-signature attachment: stored
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev