[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Plans for 1.4.3?

From: Malcolm Rowe <malcolm-svn-dev_at_farside.org.uk>
Date: 2007-01-02 21:53:06 CET

On Tue, Jan 02, 2007 at 12:49:52PM -0800, Daniel Rall wrote:
> > WDYT? -- justin
> I'm in favor of this backport. With ra_serf not yet built by default,
> and all the changes in this diff contained within the
> subversion/libsvn_ra_serf/ directory, this is a very low-risk change
> which has the upside of potentially getting more testing of ra_serf by
> adventurous users who build it themselves.

+1. While this is a feature rather than a bugfix, ra_serf is only going
to be used by people actively trying to test that feature. Providing a
packaged release with the latest ra_serf code is IMO a good idea.


  • application/pgp-signature attachment: stored
Received on Tue Jan 2 21:53:56 2007

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.