[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: RFC: Changing conditions for 'M'odified status

From: Erik Huelsmann <ehuels_at_gmail.com>
Date: 2006-11-12 22:21:20 CET

On 11/10/06, Ben Collins-Sussman <sussman@red-bean.com> wrote:
> On 11/10/06, Peter Lundblad <plundblad@google.com> wrote:
> > Erik: I think this proposal is confusing. It talks about the mtime
> > problem of aging WCs, speed improvements and changed semantics. Maybe
> > I am following the list too sporadically, but I think it would help if you
> > clearly stated out the objectives of your work, the exact change to
> > the change detection algorithm and all the impacts it would have on all cases.
> > Also, your assumed common usecases would be good to include.
> +1 on what Peter said. I'm confused. I'd love to see the proposal
> more clearly laid out in a design doc or something, especially since
> this change could have very strong effects.

I'm sorry, but in my head, everything is very clear. Could you ask
some more targetted questions, in order for me to understand what's
missing in my rfc?



To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sun Nov 12 22:21:41 2006

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.