Re: RFC: Changing conditions for 'M'odified status

On 11/10/06, Peter Lundblad <plundblad@google.com> wrote:

> Erik: I think this proposal is confusing. It talks about the mtime
> problem of aging WCs, speed improvements and changed semantics. Maybe
> I am following the list too sporadically, but I think it would help if you
> clearly stated out the objectives of your work, the exact change to
> the change detection algorithm and all the impacts it would have on all cases.
> Also, your assumed common usecases would be good to include.

+1 on what Peter said. I'm confused. I'd love to see the proposal
more clearly laid out in a design doc or something, especially since
this change could have very strong effects.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Nov 10 16:09:05 2006