Lieven Govaerts <svnlgo@mobsol.be> wrote on 10/19/2006 09:28:06 AM:
> Mark Phippard wrote:
> > Marcus Rueckert <darix@web.de> wrote on 10/19/2006 09:14:01 AM:
> >
> >
> >>> osts as well, even better.
> >>>
> >> why is lgpl a problem for them?
> >>
> >
> > *shrug* I am not a lawyer, but I guess they do not view it as
compatible
> > with the EPL. The svn code is not going to be in our repository or
> > anything, but we do want to be able to distribute svn binaries, as we
do
> > now with Subclipse. And I guess if we want to do that, then they feel
the
> > need to approve all of it. I doubt they are going to accept the
Sleepycat
> > license either, but that wouldn't be too big of an impact for us to
not
> > include that. Other than that it is a bitch to build Win32 without
it.
> >
> My question is slightly off topic for this discussion, but can you
> elaborate on the 'it is a bitch to build Win32 without bdb'?
>
> I can build Subversion without BDB on Windows, so I'm wondering where
> you encounter any problems.
Last time I had to do this (18 months?) you had to run gen-make.py and
then manually edit the generated projects. Is there an easy way to do
this now?
Mark
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Oct 19 15:34:03 2006