Mark Phippard wrote:
> Marcus Rueckert <darix@web.de> wrote on 10/19/2006 09:14:01 AM:
>
>
>>> osts as well, even better.
>>>
>> why is lgpl a problem for them?
>>
>
> *shrug* I am not a lawyer, but I guess they do not view it as compatible
> with the EPL. The svn code is not going to be in our repository or
> anything, but we do want to be able to distribute svn binaries, as we do
> now with Subclipse. And I guess if we want to do that, then they feel the
> need to approve all of it. I doubt they are going to accept the Sleepycat
> license either, but that wouldn't be too big of an impact for us to not
> include that. Other than that it is a bitch to build Win32 without it.
>
My question is slightly off topic for this discussion, but can you
elaborate on the 'it is a bitch to build Win32 without bdb'?
I can build Subversion without BDB on Windows, so I'm wondering where
you encounter any problems.
Lieven.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Oct 19 15:31:03 2006