[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: [PATCH] Improve mingw support

From: Garrett Rooney <rooneg_at_electricjellyfish.net>
Date: 2006-10-18 03:14:36 CEST

On 10/17/06, Branko ╚ibej <brane@xbc.nu> wrote:

> That's ... *bad*
> It's more important to encrypt the passwords than to be able to compile
> with MinGW, so -1.
> Instead, you could declare CopyProtectData in svn_private_config.hw
> #ifdef __MINGW32__.

It's actually not CopyProtectData that's the issue, it's
diff here that inlines their declarations in simple_providers.c for
MinGW, but is it's just based on some random stuff I found out on the
web, I have no clue if it's correct. It seems to run, although I
haven't tested it fully. I'm also kind of curious if this sort of
thing is considered ok, do windows people really just inline defs to
work around stuff like this?


To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org

Received on Wed Oct 18 03:14:55 2006

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.