[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: svn: Checksum mismatch

From: Erik Huelsmann <ehuels_at_gmail.com>
Date: 2006-09-30 21:14:53 CEST

On 9/28/06, Jens Seidel <jensseidel@users.sf.net> wrote:
> Hi Erik,
>
> what's the status of this bug? Is it already fixed in trunk?
> If not I suggest you open a bug report to ensure we do not forget about
> it ...
>
> On Wed, Sep 06, 2006 at 09:47:15AM -0400, Garrett Rooney wrote:
> > On 9/6/06, Erik Huelsmann <ehuels@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >On 9/5/06, Jens Seidel <jensseidel@users.sf.net> wrote:
> > >> I have good news. I was able to create a small example which demonstrates
> > >> the checksum error in Version 1.4.0 (Release Candidate 5).
> > >
> > >I have been looking at svn_wc_crawl_revisions2 which drives the
>
> [snip]
>
> > >But, in case of replaced paths, I think that the driver should call
> > >reporter->delete_path() for replace-no-history and
> > >reporter->link_path() for replace-with-history schedules.
> >
> > That seems reasonable to me, although I don't know nearly enough about
> > how this stuff works, so take that with a grain of salt...
> >
> > >There are some oddities wrt replaced paths a bit further down too (why
> > >don't we ->link_path() for replace-with-history scheduled files
> > >everywhere? Using set_path implies we want to receive updates from the
> > >file in the current location...)
> >
> > It does seem like replacements should be handled specially there...

I committed a fix to trunk in r21720.

> Jens

HTH,

Erik.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sat Sep 30 21:15:11 2006

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.