[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: svn: Checksum mismatch

From: Jens Seidel <jensseidel_at_users.sourceforge.net>
Date: 2006-09-28 14:02:36 CEST

Hi Erik,

what's the status of this bug? Is it already fixed in trunk?
If not I suggest you open a bug report to ensure we do not forget about
it ...

On Wed, Sep 06, 2006 at 09:47:15AM -0400, Garrett Rooney wrote:
> On 9/6/06, Erik Huelsmann <ehuels@gmail.com> wrote:
> >On 9/5/06, Jens Seidel <jensseidel@users.sf.net> wrote:
> >> I have good news. I was able to create a small example which demonstrates
> >> the checksum error in Version 1.4.0 (Release Candidate 5).
> >
> >I have been looking at svn_wc_crawl_revisions2 which drives the


> >But, in case of replaced paths, I think that the driver should call
> >reporter->delete_path() for replace-no-history and
> >reporter->link_path() for replace-with-history schedules.
> That seems reasonable to me, although I don't know nearly enough about
> how this stuff works, so take that with a grain of salt...
> >There are some oddities wrt replaced paths a bit further down too (why
> >don't we ->link_path() for replace-with-history scheduled files
> >everywhere? Using set_path implies we want to receive updates from the
> >file in the current location...)
> It does seem like replacements should be handled specially there...


To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Sep 28 14:01:39 2006

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.