Re: svn commit: r21480 - in trunk: . subversion/libsvn_ra_dav

On 9/14/06, David Summers <david@summersoft.fay.ar.us> wrote:

> I'm still not following why Neon 0.24 has to go. If there was a bug or
> something I could understand. But as far as I know Neon 0.24 works great.
> Why get rid of it if it is not causing problems?

Because its APIs are sufficiently different from those of Neon 0.25
and up that it was causing bugs to occur that only showed up with
0.24, so if by some chance they new code actually managed to compile
with 0.24, it wouldn't actually work. You can only bend over
backwards to support old versions for so long, sooner or later you
have to stop.

If you're willing to write the code to make 0.24 work, then be my
guest, but personally, I am not.

-garrett

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Sep 14 14:52:53 2006