Re: [bug] Merge resulting in a conflicted WC file does not produce a "conflicted" merge notification
On Wed, 09 Aug 2006, Garrett Rooney wrote:
> On 8/8/06, Daniel Rall <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> >The callback is getting invoked with an action of
> >svn_wc_notify_update_add, which has no handling for a conflicts (only
> >for simple adds):
> >The handling for conflicts exists in the "case
> >svn_wc_notify_update_update" block.
> >It appears that we're not expecting "svn_wc_notify_update_add" to ever
> >perform a merge -- and thus threaten to create conflicts -- as we're
> >seeing here.
> This is one of those things where you'd think it'd be easy to fix, but
> it actually causes other problems down the road. If you make it show
> conflicts on adds, then it breaks dry run merges in some cases...
> There's an issue about it, but I forget the number.
Garrett notes that he reported this issue a while back as:
I'll add a (failing) test case for it based on that shell script
Received on Thu Aug 10 01:18:01 2006
- application/pgp-signature attachment: stored
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev