Re: possibly useful info re: FSFS corruption

On 7/10/06, Malcolm Rowe <malcolm-svn-dev@farside.org.uk> wrote:
> Thanks for the report. I've no evidence to prove it, but I suspect
> that the reason that binary files are usually involved is simply because
> they tend to generate larger revisions, and so more data to be written,
> leading to a higher chance of failure.

FWIW, at ApacheCon, we got a report that this problem is being seen
over once a week for a particular user with ~30MB files. So, there is
a really nasty gremlin that we need to fix. -- justin

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Jul 11 17:50:08 2006