Re: [PATCH] test for svn status -v -N -u

Garrett Rooney wrote:
> On 6/17/06, Martin Hauner <martin.hauner@gmx.net> wrote:
>
>> But at least, here is a test that checks the -u -N combination.
>>
>> Possible that the order of the expected_output needs to be adjusted.
>> Since svn status doesn't currently pass the test I don't know what
>> is the correct order.
>
> Test committed (with the addition of XFail since it's not working) in
> r20174, thanks.
>
> Despite Mike's warning about the complexity of the status code, if
> you're still willing to dive into it I'm sure it'd be an educational
> experience, and we'd all appreciate it ;-)

I can give it a try but so far i always got lost somewhere when i
stepped through the status code.

 From Mike's and your comments I get the impression that everyone
tries hard to avoid wc code... hmmmm ;-)

-- 
Martin
Subcommander, http://subcommander.tigris.org
a cross platform Win32/Unix/MacOSX subversion GUI client & diff/merge tool.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org