[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Agggh! 64-bit bug still present in 1.3.2 (PATCH already in issuetracker)

From: Marcus Rueckert <darix_at_web.de>
Date: 2006-06-07 05:36:07 CEST

On 2006-06-06 19:45:19 -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> >On 2006-06-06 17:35:34 -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> >>Take a look at the Fedora Core 5 SRPM and .spec file for
> >>subversion-1.3.1.
> >>It does some similar things, but not as part of the .spec file. Instead,
> >>the rpath option is moved out of the "LINK" command, and into a
> >>"LINK_LIBS"
> >>command, and that is called only when linking libraries, not when linking
> >>programs. This makes good sense to me and seems to help eliminate the RPM
> >>build whackiness, and can be backported to other versons of RedHat or
> >>Fedora.
> >
> >are you sure the rpath issue is still valid? it doesnt looks like that
> >to me. i tested with 1.3.2.
>
> How did you test it

reading the build log. i still saw a few -L$BUILD_DIR but no params in
the cmdline for setting the rpath.

and i double checked with maxb. he stated that svn used the la files for
linking since quite some time already instead "-L../.... -lsomelib"

hope that helps

    darix

-- 
           openSUSE - SUSE Linux is my linux
               openSUSE is good for you
                   www.opensuse.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Jun 7 05:36:43 2006

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.