On Wed, 07 Jun 2006 02:10:13 +0530, Michael W Thelen <mike@pietdepsi.com>
wrote:
> Madan U S wrote:
>> Dan : I think hidden makes sense and is less verbose. Are you -1 if
>> hidden is used? If so, pl. let me know (hey, I cant face the wrath of a
>> committer, you know ;)
>>
>> [[[
>> Implement 'svnmerge hidden'.
>> 'svnmerge hidden' will list all the revisions marked as blocked, against
>> the default or a given head (given by the -S/--head options).
>>
>> * contrib/client-side/svnmerge.py
>> (action_hidden): New function to handle the 'svnmerge hidden' command.
>> (command_table): Added new Option for handling the 'hidden'
>> subcommand.
>> ]]]
>>
>> PS : this patch assumes that the patch submitted at
>> http://www.orcaware.com/pipermail/svnmerge/2006-April/000534.html has
>> already been applied.
>
> Thanks for the patch... if no one comments on it, I'll file an issue for
> it in the issue tracker.
Hey, Mike. No need. Theres has been a little bit of disconnect here. The
patch was discussed at svnmerge@orcaware.com and given up in favor of
'svnmerge avail -B'.
Those mails didnt make it to dev@subversion.tigris.org.
/me wonders about the cross-postings and subsequent disconnects...
Regards,
Madan.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Jun 6 21:34:47 2006