Re: [SVNMERGE][PATCH] implement 'svnmerge hidden'

Madan U S wrote:
> Dan : I think hidden makes sense and is less verbose. Are you -1 if
> hidden is used? If so, pl. let me know (hey, I cant face the wrath of a
> committer, you know ;)
>
> [[[
> Implement 'svnmerge hidden'.
> 'svnmerge hidden' will list all the revisions marked as blocked, against
> the default or a given head (given by the -S/--head options).
>
> * contrib/client-side/svnmerge.py
> (action_hidden): New function to handle the 'svnmerge hidden' command.
> (command_table): Added new Option for handling the 'hidden' subcommand.
> ]]]
>
> PS : this patch assumes that the patch submitted at
> http://www.orcaware.com/pipermail/svnmerge/2006-April/000534.html has
> already been applied.

Thanks for the patch... if no one comments on it, I'll file an issue for
it in the issue tracker.

Here's a link to the patch in the archive:
http://svn.haxx.se/dev/archive-2006-04/0414.shtml

-- 
Michael W Thelen
It is a mistake to think you can solve any major problems just with
potatoes.       -- Douglas Adams
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org