David Anderson wrote:
>> As a reminder to testers/signers: if you do BDB testing (and please
>> do), you should indicate which Berkeley DB version you tested
>> against. This is more significant for this release than for recent
>> previous ones as we've added support for a new version of BDB (4.4),
>> and that support wasn't trivial. Thanks.
>
> Big +1. BDB 4.4 support was a large change to the BDB backend, and
> reporters need to say which they are using.
>
> Also, I would like to remind that at this stage, the tarball is
> unblessed. We do want to get the sigs so that the RC tarball is
> announced on users@, so as to get a wider audience testing the
> tarball.
>
> So please, full committers, do report problems, but if the bugs you
> find are minor, please also post sigs, so that we can release the RC
> and start the soak. I'm not asking you to be less vigilant during the
> signing process, but don't -1 the RC because of a typo in some output
> that makes a test fail, if you get the idea. We do need to start the
> public soak if no major problems are found.
Please, remember to SHOUT that there is a working copy version bump.
Otherwise people we'll get angry *very* fast if their working copy becomes
unusable with SVN 1.3.x just for having tried 1.4.0-rc for a few minutes...
--
Giovanni Bajo
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Jun 2 01:22:33 2006