[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: 1.3.1 tarballs up for testing/signing (Again)

From: Sviatoslav Sviridov <svd_at_altlinux.ru>
Date: 2006-03-28 18:53:18 CEST

Philip Martin wrote on 3/28/2006 7:49 PM:
> Sviatoslav Sviridov <svd@altlinux.ru> writes:
>
>> So with '--enable dso':
>>
>> - all checks for FS_TYPE=fsfs passed
>> - checks for FS_TYPE=bdb passed except one: repos_test failed
>> - perl bindings tests passed except '6ra'
>> - all ruby tests passed
>> - javahl tests failed
>
> Is the repos_test error still the same:
>
> #0 0x3ae6bb67 in ?? ()
> #1 0x3ab57e8e in run_cleanups (cref=0x819ef30) at apr_pools.c:1952
> #2 0x3ab573d1 in apr_pool_destroy (pool=0x819ef20) at apr_pools.c:731
> #3 0x3ab572fb in apr_pool_clear (pool=0x80580f8) at apr_pools.c:691
> #4 0x3aac4b43 in main (argc=4, argv=0xaf9d7874) at
> subversion/tests/svn_test_main.c:315
> #5 0x3abc949e in __libc_start_main () from /lib/libc.so.6
> #6 0x08049611 in _start ()
>
> That looks like a bug in the way pools are being used. Configuring
> APR with --enable-pool-debug=yes (and building with debug info) and
> then running repos_test under valgrind might help identify the
> problem.

Yes, backtrace still points to apr_pools.c.
Ok, I'll try to rebuild APR with --enable-pool-debug=yes and debug info,
and then try to run it under valgring...

Can you show how to run in under valgrind (I'm not familiar with it).

-- 
Best Regards,
Sviatoslav Sviridov

Received on Tue Mar 28 18:56:27 2006

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.