Re: [PATCH] Correct path to Perl modules (issue 2479)

Mattias Engdegård wrote:
> It's a lot better than having bindings that can be tested but WON'T
> WORK AT ALL once installed, which is the present case.

I don't understand this statement; I'm using the Perl bindings (1.3.0
and 1.3.1-to-be) all the time (since I use SVK religiously). You may
need to be more specific about how you are building the bindings (e.g.
you are not be using the defaults??).

The other thing you should recognize is that 1.3.1 is being tested right
now so that the focus of the core developers is elsewhere. I would
strongly support improving the Perl bindings, including your other patch
to add new API's. It just so happens that SVK doesn't use those other
API's [yet], so the primary consumer of the Perl bindings hasn't needed
the additional API's.

John

-- 
John Peacock
Director of Information Research and Technology
Rowman & Littlefield Publishing Group
4501 Forbes Boulevard
Suite H
Lanham, MD  20706
301-459-3366 x.5010
fax 301-429-5748
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org