[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Feature request: Longer "use --force to override" messages

From: Barry Scott <barry_at_barrys-emacs.org>
Date: 2006-03-12 17:54:20 CET

On Mar 12, 2006, at 14:29, Vincent Starre wrote:

> Julian Foad wrote:
>> Vincent Starre wrote:
>>> Simple request here. Sometimes SVN says something like "cannot do
>>> this, file has local changes. (use --force to override this
>>> restriction)", but it doesnt do anything to explain the true
>>> implications of this. I am left wondering when, for example, I
>>> move a modified file, "Does this mean it will destroy my changes?"
>>> Anyone agree/disagree?
>> I agree. The right place to explain what "--force" does is in the
>> help (not in the error message). The help system has recently
>> been modified to allow the description of an option to be tailored
>> to suit different subcommands.
> I would disagree with that. The help has no way of being entirely
> specific to your own situation. For example: --force might cause
> the over-writing of a file which exists, /or/ it might cause
> partially-missing history (or both). Being told all the things --
> force might do would be just as ambiguous as guessing all the
> things --force might do, wouldnt it?

The third way might be to list what would happen when a dry run is
performed with --force --dry-run.


To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sun Mar 12 17:54:52 2006

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.