[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Feature request: Longer "use --force to override" messages

From: Vincent Starre <vstarre_at_comcast.net>
Date: 2006-03-12 15:29:53 CET

Julian Foad wrote:

> Vincent Starre wrote:
>
>> Simple request here. Sometimes SVN says something like "cannot do
>> this, file has local changes. (use --force to override this
>> restriction)", but it doesnt do anything to explain the true
>> implications of this. I am left wondering when, for example, I move a
>> modified file, "Does this mean it will destroy my changes?"
>>
>> Anyone agree/disagree?
>
>
> I agree. The right place to explain what "--force" does is in the
> help (not in the error message). The help system has recently been
> modified to allow the description of an option to be tailored to suit
> different subcommands.

I would disagree with that. The help has no way of being entirely
specific to your own situation. For example: --force might cause the
over-writing of a file which exists, /or/ it might cause
partially-missing history (or both). Being told all the things --force
might do would be just as ambiguous as guessing all the things --force
might do, wouldnt it?

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sun Mar 12 15:30:10 2006

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.