On 3/9/06, Malcolm Rowe <malcolm-svn-dev@farside.org.uk> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 09, 2006 at 01:29:44PM -0800, Garrett Rooney wrote:
> > On 3/9/06, Malcolm Rowe <malcolm-svn-dev@farside.org.uk> wrote:
> > > On Thu, Mar 09, 2006 at 03:54:39PM -0500, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> > > > Repository: http://svn.collab.net/repos/svn
> > > > UUID: 65390229-12b7-0310-b90b-f21a5aa7ec8e
> > > > M trunk/subversion/libsvn_fs_base/tree.c
> > > > M trunk/subversion/libsvn_fs_base/dag.c
> > > > M trunk/subversion/libsvn_fs_base/bdb/nodes-table.h
> > > >
> > > > Now I've got at least *some* real estate savings per-path and those
> > > > paths are much closer to what good log message policy would demand of me.
> > > >
> > > > Thoughts?
> > > >
> > >
> > > +1. Both easier and better. Ditch the UUID though, unless you can
> > > actually think of a real-world use for it?
> >
> > -0, this becomes less useful on large repositories like the ASF one,
> > when the project root can potentially be many levels deep into the
> > tree.
> >
>
> Is that a -0 to 'split the URL into repos root and remainder' specifically
> (as demonstrated above), or a -0 to 'show committables as [parts of]
> URLs rather than the specified targets'?
-0 to splitting the URL into repos root and remainder.
-garrett
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Mar 9 23:17:16 2006