Re: [PATCH] Flush stdout more often

On 3/6/06, Stefan Haller <haller@ableton.com> wrote:
> I'm told that this patch won't be committed because no consensus was
> reached. Frankly, my impression was that a consensus *was* reached:
> many people gave good reasons why the patch is useful, and you stopped
> arguing against them. But apparently that's not what people call
> "consensus" here, so I'm unsure how to proceed with this issue.

Consensus is when everyone agrees.

> Do you still object to the patch after everything that was said in this
> thread?

Yes, I still object. I pointed out what my objections are to this
patch and others have also outlined several strategies (custom
notification callbacks or pty's) that can be undertaken by you to
resolve your specific problem without cluttering Subversion's core
code and to do so in such a way that will resolve this issue for prior
releases too - which your patch can not do.

> Does it help if I collect some timing data of some sort? If
> so, what exactly would be useful?

Any timing data that you could produce would not address my
fundamental concerns that the core is the wrong place to address this.
   -- justin

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Mar 7 09:27:40 2006