Re: apr_strnatcasecmp vs. strcasecmp

On 2/15/06, Paul Burba <paulb@softlanding.com> wrote:
> A quick question: Is there some reason we use (with one exception in
> config.c) strcasecmp() instead of apr_strnatcasecmp()?
>
> On OS400 V5R4 strcasecmp() is one of a handful of functions on that still
> expects EBCDIC strings. apr_strnatcasecmp() works correctly on UTF-8
> strings.

I see that httpd recently switched from 'apr_strnatcasecmp' to
'strcasecmp'. Would this introduce problems on OS400 V5R4?

See http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=230708&view=rev

Cheers,

David
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
>
>

--
David James -- http://www.cs.toronto.edu/~james
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org