apr_strnatcasecmp vs. strcasecmp

Hi All,

A quick question: Is there some reason we use (with one exception in
config.c) strcasecmp() instead of apr_strnatcasecmp()?

On OS400 V5R4 strcasecmp() is one of a handful of functions on that still
expects EBCDIC strings. apr_strnatcasecmp() works correctly on UTF-8
strings.

I'd like to submit a patch, nominally for the OS400/EBCDIC port*, that
uses the latter exclusively. I just wanted to make sure I wasn't missing
something.
 
Paul B.

*http://svn.haxx.se/dev/archive-2006-02/0519.shtml

_____________________________________________________________________________
Scanned for SoftLanding Systems, Inc. and SoftLanding Europe Plc by IBM Email Security Management Services powered by MessageLabs.
_____________________________________________________________________________

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Feb 15 21:23:31 2006