Re: Status of sorted order patches

Malcolm Rowe wrote:
> Julian, for the reasons Daniel mentions, I think we should at least make
> the output of 'svn diff' sorted in the 1.4.x timeframe.

+1. I think we really want this and just need to start doing it.

> The original
> patches that were posted looked fine to me (the diff subset, that is),

The original patches? You mean mine
<http://svn.haxx.se/dev/archive-2004-06/0000.shtml> ? Or Kean Johnston's more
recent patch for "svn diff" <http://svn.haxx.se/dev/archive-2005-11/1033.shtml>
? Or something else?

The last posted version of mine didn't correctly sort diffs that contacted the
repository, only local diffs.

Kean's patch sorted local and repos-to-repos diffs fully, and repos-to-wc diffs
partially.

> and I was thinking of committing them alone, but I'll hold off if you've
> got something that handles everything at once.

I've just been having a go at updating my patch, but haven't really got it
ready for use, and it wasn't a small change that handles everything at once, it
was a set of additions just like what Kean did, so I'd suggest starting from
his patch.

- Julian

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Feb 9 20:09:55 2006