Mathias Weinert wrote:
> Ryan Schmidt <subversion-2006Q1@ryandesign.com> wrote:
>>On Feb 6, 2006, at 11:59, Mathias Weinert wrote:
>>
>>>>I found something which first seems to be bug for me. I am not
>>>>sure if I even already read about it but at least I didn't find
>>>>anything in the issue tracker. But after thinking a while it
>>>>might also be a feature. So here comes the description:
>>>>
>>>>I want to check out a path that doesn't exist any more so I use
>>>>a peg revision. Unfortunately Subversion uses the @-suffix to
>>>>build the working copy path name if I don't provide one:
>>>>
>>>>$ svn co -r 223 svn://myrepos/repos/trunk/olddir_at_223
>>>>A olddir@223/file2.txt
>>>>A olddir@223/newdir
>>>>A olddir@223/branchfile.txt
>>>>Checked out revision 223.
>>>>
>>>>This happens with Subversion 1.3.0 under cygwin as well as when
>>>>I use the win32 binaries.
>>>>
>>>>As already said: is this a bug or a feature?
>>>
>>>Any ideas or comments to the following post I made on 01/25?
>>
>>My personal feeling is that this is a bug. Just my 0.02 �.
>
> As I didn't get any more responses I now assume that this is
> a bug and therefor forward it to the dev list.
Yes, it's a bug. Thanks for the report.
- Julian
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Feb 8 18:10:17 2006