Ryan Schmidt <subversion-2006Q1@ryandesign.com> wrote:
> On Feb 6, 2006, at 11:59, Mathias Weinert wrote:
>
> >> I found something which first seems to be bug for me. I am not
> >> sure if I even already read about it but at least I didn't find
> >> anything in the issue tracker. But after thinking a while it
> >> might also be a feature. So here comes the description:
> >>
> >> I want to check out a path that doesn't exist any more so I use
> >> a peg revision. Unfortunately Subversion uses the @-suffix to
> >> build the working copy path name if I don't provide one:
> >>
> >> $ svn co -r 223 svn://myrepos/repos/trunk/olddir_at_223
> >> A olddir@223/file2.txt
> >> A olddir@223/newdir
> >> A olddir@223/branchfile.txt
> >> Checked out revision 223.
> >>
> >> This happens with Subversion 1.3.0 under cygwin as well as when
> >> I use the win32 binaries.
> >>
> >> As already said: is this a bug or a feature?
> >
> > Any ideas or comments to the following post I made on 01/25?
>
> My personal feeling is that this is a bug. Just my 0.02 €.
>
> It's of course not difficult to avoid if you don't want it:
>
> $ svn co -r 223 svn://myrepos/repos/trunk/olddir_at_223 olddir
>
As I didn't get any more responses I now assume that this is
a bug and therefor forward it to the dev list.
Mathias
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Feb 8 09:27:51 2006