[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: [PATCH] [Issue 1942] svn+ssh should use the port value

From: Kamesh Jayachandran <kamesh_at_collab.net>
Date: 2006-02-01 13:38:10 CET

Hi Karl,

Yes same 16 Test Case failures for make svnsshcheck with and without my
changes.
Here are they.
FAIL: commit_tests.py 34: post commit hook failure case testing
FAIL: switch_tests.py 16: relocate with prefixes longer than repo root
FAIL: stat_tests.py 17: status output in XML format
FAIL: blame_tests.py 4: blame output in XML format
FAIL: lock_tests.py 1: lock a file and verify that it's locked
FAIL: lock_tests.py 7: examine the fields of a lockfile for correctness
FAIL: svnsync_tests.py 1: copy and modify
FAIL: svnsync_tests.py 2: copy from previous version and modify
FAIL: svnsync_tests.py 3: copy from previous version
FAIL: svnsync_tests.py 4: modified in place
FAIL: svnsync_tests.py 5: tag empty trunk
FAIL: svnsync_tests.py 6: tag trunk containing a sub-directory
FAIL: svnsync_tests.py 7: tag trunk containing a file (#2)
FAIL: svnsync_tests.py 8: tag trunk containing a file
FAIL: svnsync_tests.py 9: tag with a modified file
FAIL: svnsync_tests.py 10: directory property changes

Anyway running the same tests with latest sources.
FYI mine is a VPATH build.

Will dig through for the root cause.

With regards
Kamesh Jayachandran

kfogel@collab.net wrote:
> Branko Čibej <brane@xbc.nu> writes:
>
>> Kamesh Jayachandran wrote:
>>
>>> Hi All,
>>> I hereby attach patch for #1942.
>>>
>>> Ran make check/make autodavcheck found nothing alarming.
>>> Ran make svnsshcheck found 16 tests failing with and without this
>>> patch and hence attribute the failures to out of date work area and
>>> submit this patch.
>>>
>> You mean you didn't actually check why those tests were failing?
>> That's not nice at all.
>>
>
> Kamesh, did you mean "attribute the failures to causes independent of
> my changes"? That's very different from "out of date work area", but
> it would make a lot more sense in context.
>
> (Were the 16 failures exactly the same failures both and without your
> changes? Do you know what's causing them?)
>
> -Karl
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Feb 1 13:35:09 2006

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.