[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Release policy question

From: Garrett Rooney <rooneg_at_electricjellyfish.net>
Date: 2006-01-31 23:37:01 CET

On 1/31/06, Daniel Rall <dlr@collab.net> wrote:
> On Tue, 31 Jan 2006, Karl Fogel wrote:
> > Mark Phippard <markp@softlanding.com> writes:
> > > Does this mean that the "GA" release of Subversion 1.3 might have been
> > > release 1.3.8?
> >
> > No, thanks to the RCs that catch most of the problems. It would have
> > been 1.3.1, though, instead of 1.3.0 (if I recall the series of events
> > correctly).
> FWIW, isn't that what httpd does?

I'm not positive about HTTPD, but APR does something like that. We've
burned through two version numbers for the current APR release due to
issues that were not caught until the tarballs were out there being
tested. Not that it's a big deal though, version numbers are cheap


To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Jan 31 23:37:39 2006

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.