Re: Release policy question

On 1/31/06, Daniel Rall <dlr@collab.net> wrote:
> On Tue, 31 Jan 2006, Karl Fogel wrote:
>
> > Mark Phippard <markp@softlanding.com> writes:
> > > Does this mean that the "GA" release of Subversion 1.3 might have been
> > > release 1.3.8?
> >
> > No, thanks to the RCs that catch most of the problems. It would have
> > been 1.3.1, though, instead of 1.3.0 (if I recall the series of events
> > correctly).
>
> FWIW, isn't that what httpd does?

I'm not positive about HTTPD, but APR does something like that. We've
burned through two version numbers for the current APR release due to
issues that were not caught until the tarballs were out there being
tested. Not that it's a big deal though, version numbers are cheap
;-)

-garrett

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Jan 31 23:37:39 2006