[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Release policy question

From: <kfogel_at_collab.net>
Date: 2006-01-31 20:14:15 CET

Daniel Rall <dlr@collab.net> writes:
> I too prefer Greg's suggested strategy. It's simpler, and results in
> less possibility for errors when referring to a release, since it
> needn't be qualified with "rcX".

Hmm. Somebody is misunderstanding something here, but I'm not sure if
it's you, me, or Greg, or some combination therewhom :-).

IIUC, Greg wasn't proposing getting rid of the "-rcX" tarballs. He
was just saying let's never issue two tarballs with different content
but the same name (something we currently can do, and have done,
albeit in very limited circumstances).


To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Jan 31 21:56:30 2006

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.