On Sun, 29 Jan 2006, David James wrote:
...
> > Perhaps the language on
> > http://subversion.tigris.org/project_issues.html "Issue tracker guidelines" should be
> > relaxed a bit?
> >
> > After beeing chastised a bit ealier, I was reluctant on approaching
> > the dev list directly.
>
> A safe rule is: If you are trying to help Subversion development, send
> your mail to dev@. For this reason, bug reports are always welcome on
> the dev@ list, especially if the bug report contains all the
> information we need to reproduce the bug on our own systems.
>
> We should probably update project_issues.html and bugs.html to note
> that detailed bug reports are welcome on the dev@ list. I am often
> disappointed to miss important bug reports because they were only sent
> to the users@ list, which I do not read as often.
Max and I were discussing the other side of this coin the other day on
IRC. He was saying that there were previously a lot more bug reports
(around 1.0 the timeframe?), which initially spurred instigation of
the tight issue tracker guidelines. If bug reports have slowed up a
bit, perhaps the language on the tracker page should be changed to be
more allowing of obvious reports going straight into the tracker?
In any case, I'm +1 on David's suggestion.
--
Daniel Rall
- application/pgp-signature attachment: stored
Received on Tue Jan 31 20:23:16 2006