[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Time for a 1.3.1 release? (without the bdb fixes)

From: Blair Zajac <blair_at_orcaware.com>
Date: 2006-01-31 07:40:01 CET

On Jan 29, 2006, at 12:30 PM, kfogel@collab.net wrote:

> Branko ─îibej <brane@xbc.nu> writes:
>> David James wrote:
>>> Now that Subversion 1.3.0 has been out for a while, we have
>>> accumulated a number of very useful fixes for 1.3.1.
>> What's this rush with releases all of a sudden? 1.3.0 hasn't been out
>> a month. Our usual schedule was 2--3 months for a patch release.
> Hmm, looks like we've been flying by the seats of our collective pants
> on release schedules :-).
> I always thought that micro (patch) release schedules were based more
> on what fixes are available than on how many weeks/months have passed
> since the previous minor release in that line. If the fixes are for
> severe bugs, for example, than a quicker release is justified.
> Whether the changes in 1.3.1 meet that criterion is a different
> question -- I personally think we could wait for some more. But the
> overall point is that it's more about content than timing.

Agreed that we could wait for some more patches.


Blair Zajac, Ph.D.
CTO, OrcaWare Technologies
Subversion training, consulting and support
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Jan 31 07:40:38 2006

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.