On Mon, 30 Jan 2006 kfogel@collab.net wrote:
> Julian Foad <julianfoad@btopenworld.com> writes:
> > Since this is not entirely obvious, and furthermore I remember getting
> > confused by it (possibly by the corresponding output of "svn status"
> > at the user level) when I was new to Subversion, I think we want a
> > comment somewhere. How about this:
> >
> > [[[
> > Clarify that the "ignored" status only applies to unversioned items.
> >
> > * subversion/include/svn_wc.h
> > (svn_wc_status_ignored): Expand the doc string.
> > ]]]
> >
> > Index: subversion/include/svn_wc.h
> > ===================================================================
> > --- subversion/include/svn_wc.h (revision 18266)
> > +++ subversion/include/svn_wc.h (working copy)
> > @@ -1612,7 +1612,7 @@
> > /** local mods received conflicting repos mods */
> > svn_wc_status_conflicted,
> >
> > - /** a resource marked as ignored */
> > + /** is unversioned but configured to be ignored */
> > svn_wc_status_ignored,
> >
> > /** an unversioned resource is in the way of the versioned resource */
>
> +1 (assuming it's accurate, which I'm trusting your word on :-) ).
>
+1, after checking assemble_status ins status.c. Something similar
applies to externals, which, for the parent directory, are unversioned.
Also, I found that svn_wc_status_{missing,obstructed} is cases where the
status item will have an entry, but we don't want to try to traverse into
a subdirectory. That's a late answer to Malcolm's question.
Thanks,
//Peter
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Mon Jan 30 21:16:59 2006