The context for this is what Justin wrote (earlier):
> The point here is that because a few people want an accelerated
> release schedule for 1.4, it means that features ready at branch-time
> will now have to wait until 2007.
Julian Foad wrote:
> Greg Stein wrote:
>> On Sun, Jan 29, 2006 at 12:21:41AM +0000, Julian Foad wrote:
>>> Greg Stein wrote:
>>>> On Fri, Jan 27, 2006 at 11:18:57PM +0000, Julian Foad wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> But I really can't believe you meant that sentence literally; if
>>>>> you did, please explain - especially "ready" and "2007".
>>>>
>>>> Heh. You said it yourself at the bottom of this reply. That if
>>>> something doesn't get into 1.4 in the next month, then it will have to
>>>> wait for 1.5, and you said "January 2007". That's what Justin is
>>>> referring to.
>>>
>>> No Greg; read it again.
>>
>> I read it a couple times already. Your reply is totally unhelpful.
[...]
To point out a bit more that I missed just then:
When I mentioned "January 2007" at the bottom of my reply to Justin, it was
within the context of "Imagine we were doing a yearly cycle." I'll quote it
for you:
Julian Foad wrote:
> Imagine we were doing a yearly cycle. We have just put out v1.3, so
> Serf will have to wait for the January 2007 version 1.4. Would you
> honestly feel happier with that, in your current situation, than with
> just-missing May 2006 and having to wait for September instead?
Thus: if we were releasing at a yearly interval, and v1.3 was released in
January 2006, then v1.4 will (would) be released in January 2007. But we
aren't (yet) proposing such a slow schedule, so this is totally not supporting
Justin's sentence (quoted at the top).
- Julian
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Mon Jan 30 15:27:56 2006