[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: More error leaks

From: John Peacock <jpeacock_at_rowman.com>
Date: 2006-01-26 19:00:43 CET

Julian Foad wrote:
> Malcolm Rowe wrote:
>> By moving
>> _all_ the callers to use svn_foo2(), don't we lose test coverage of the
>> original svn_foo()?
> Yes.

As long as svn_foo() is a wrapper around svn_foo2(), AND during
development the testing passed with all callers using svn_foo(), is
there anything reason to require continued testing? I'm thinking
specifically about the keywords-as-hash patch which was done in multiple
steps for exactly that reason...


John Peacock
Director of Information Research and Technology
Rowman & Littlefield Publishing Group
4501 Forbes Boulevard
Suite H
Lanham, MD  20706
301-459-3366 x.5010
fax 301-429-5748
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Jan 26 19:05:06 2006

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.