Re: Subversion/Neon License question

sussman@gmail.com wrote on 01/26/2006 12:01:20 PM:

> On 1/26/06, Mark Phippard <markp@softlanding.com> wrote:
> > I had to fill out a document at work that just listed open source
software
> > we were using along with the licenses. I was surprised when I looked
up
> > the license for Neon to see that it is GPL.
>
> Where did you see that? The neon homepage
> (http://www.webdav.org/neon/) says *Library* GPL, not GPL.
>
> The license in the tarball is the LGPL too, sitting in src/COPYING.LIB.

Sorry, I was thinking in terms of the "Neon Library" is licensed as GPL. I
had never seen the LGPL written that way.

Mark

_____________________________________________________________________________
Scanned for SoftLanding Systems, Inc. and SoftLanding Europe Plc by IBM Email Security Management Services powered by MessageLabs.
_____________________________________________________________________________

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Jan 26 18:25:39 2006