[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: More error leaks

From: Malcolm Rowe <malcolm-svn-dev_at_farside.org.uk>
Date: 2006-01-26 17:44:47 CET

On Thu, Jan 26, 2006 at 03:46:11PM +0000, Julian Foad wrote:
> * If there are cases where no use at all is yet being made of a new API,
> there's a fair chance that it won't have been tested at all and won't work
> properly. (That's true for both revised APIs and completely new APIs.)

Isn't that also true of deprecated functions though?

That is: assume we have a deprecated function svn_foo() newly
re-implemented in terms of svn_foo2(), as we tend to do. By moving
_all_ the callers to use svn_foo2(), don't we lose test coverage of the
original svn_foo()?


To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Jan 26 18:05:34 2006

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.