Ivan Zhakov wrote:
> On 1/23/06, Branko Čibej <brane@xbc.nu> wrote:
>
>> Ivan Zhakov wrote:
>>
>>> On 1/23/06, Branko Čibej <brane@xbc.nu> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>>> Let's follow APR's lead in naming the libraries. APR has
>>>>>>
>>>>>> apr.lib, aprutil.lib, apriconv.lib -- static libraries
>>>>>> libapr.dll/lib libaprutil.dll/lib libapriconv.dll/lib -- DLLs and
>>>>>> import libraries.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> I am ok to follow APR naming libraries, but in this case we have one
>>>>> problem: now we specify library name already with 'lib' in build.conf,
>>>>> so we need strip it for static libraries or change build.conf and add
>>>>> 'lib' prefix for dll and *nix libs. What is better?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> No, we don't have to do that. It's enough to teach the Windows generator
>>>> to treat those libsvn_foo specially.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> It is easy to say "teach the Windows generator" :) Sorry, I am not
>>> expert in Windows generator, might be because it is overburden. Could
>>> you give me some points how to and where do this?
>>>
>>>
>> Oof, I'd have to dig in myself. And "overburden" is an understatement. :)
>>
>> I'll try to find time to look into this soon.
>>
> Wow, it would be great! I consider that Windows DLLs is important stuff.
> So meanwhile I concentrate on other parts of this tasks: factor out
> svn_xml_is_xml_name_valid() and teach extractor.py ignore non windows
> exports.
>
> If you interesting I can send my current status of generator.
>
Nah, just check in whatever you think is ready.
-- Brane
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Mon Jan 23 19:53:34 2006