Re: [PATCH] Introduce new build.conf option "sourcelibs"
On 1/23/06, Branko Čibej <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> >> Let's follow APR's lead in naming the libraries. APR has
> >> apr.lib, aprutil.lib, apriconv.lib -- static libraries
> >> libapr.dll/lib libaprutil.dll/lib libapriconv.dll/lib -- DLLs and
> >> import libraries.
> > I am ok to follow APR naming libraries, but in this case we have one
> > problem: now we specify library name already with 'lib' in build.conf,
> > so we need strip it for static libraries or change build.conf and add
> > 'lib' prefix for dll and *nix libs. What is better?
> No, we don't have to do that. It's enough to teach the Windows generator
> to treat those libsvn_foo specially.
It is easy to say "teach the Windows generator" :) Sorry, I am not
expert in Windows generator, might be because it is overburden. Could
you give me some points how to and where do this?
Received on Mon Jan 23 15:45:19 2006
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev