[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Date ordering of revisions [was: fsfs bug in commit timestamps?]

From: Julian Foad <julianfoad_at_btopenworld.com>
Date: 2006-01-18 18:06:45 CET

Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> More precisely, concerning "svn diff" and "svn merge", we would
> not have a set of revisions, but a set of couples of revisions
> (representing oriented intervals). Am I right?

Yes. When I said:
> it does make sense for "merge" to take an arbitrary set of revisions

by "revision" I meant a change, as in "the act of revising" rather than "the
result of revising".

- Julian

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Jan 18 21:32:45 2006

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.