Re: [PATCH] --reverse option to invert -c/--change

From: Michael Brouwer <mb.7766_at_gmail.com>
Date: 2006-01-13 18:21:53 CET

I think this was mentioned before, but rather than adding more
switches why not do what svk does and have
-c NEGATIVE_NUMBER
imply the reverse of NUMBER.

Michael.

On 1/13/06, Julian Foad <julianfoad@btopenworld.com> wrote:
> Bart Robinson wrote:
> > Hi,
> > Here is a patch to help flesh out the utility of the -c/--change
> > option.
Received on Fri Jan 13 19:17:49 2006

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Brian W. Fitzpatrick: "Re: [PATCH] --reverse option to invert -c/--change"
Previous message: Bart Robinson: "Re: [PATCH] --reverse option to invert -c/--change"
In reply to: Julian Foad: "Re: [PATCH] --reverse option to invert -c/--change"
Next in thread: Brian W. Fitzpatrick: "Re: [PATCH] --reverse option to invert -c/--change"
Reply: Brian W. Fitzpatrick: "Re: [PATCH] --reverse option to invert -c/--change"
Reply: Bart Robinson: "Re: [PATCH] --reverse option to invert -c/--change"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ By Date ] [ By Thread ] [ By Subject ] [ By Author ] [ By messages with attachments ]