[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: roadmap for -c/--change option (r17054)?

From: Bart Robinson <lomew_at_pobox.com>
Date: 2006-01-10 19:45:59 CET

Thanks Garrett. Mind if I file an ENH issue for 1 and 2? I
couldn't find dups for them. I'll probably take 1.

-- bart

On 2006-1-9 Garrett Rooney <rooneg@electricjellyfish.net> wrote:
> On 1/6/06, Bart Robinson <lomew@pobox.com> wrote:
> > 1. How to handle backing out a change. Someone proposed the
> > --reverse option and that seemed to have have the most
> > support. (My opinion is +1 on this).
> Nobody seems to have done any work on this.
> > 2. Whether to fix the inconsistent use of -r to mean "change" or
> > "revision" in log and diff. (My opinion is that this would
> > be nice but sounds like a 2.0 change due to the differing
> > semantics, although I could see -c being introduced and -r
> > being left as inconsistent in a minor-level release.)
> Ditto.
> > 3. How to handle, or whether to support, multiple changes at a
> > time, e.g., svn merge -c1,2,3. (My opinion is to keep it
> > simple and not allow this, instead forcing the user to do one
> > at a time and handle the potential conflicts at each step.)
> This is unlikely to be implemented due to the fact that it's rather
> hard to do right with the current infrastructure.
> -garrett

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Jan 10 19:48:33 2006

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.