Molle Bestefich wrote:
> Folker Schamel wrote:
>
>>http://svn.haxx.se/users/archive-2003-12/0687.shtml
>
>
> I agree with that particular posting.
> Especially I think that this:
>
> "Another practical aspect is that you cannot move
> a directory and then afterwards rename files within
> this directory without an intermediate commit."
>
> is a very good point for supporting multiple cp/mv.
>
>
>
>>(This discussion also goes into some details
>>about the question what the right copy-from URL is.)
>
>
> Haven't read the entire thread :-).
>
> Since repository recording time is by definition the time when you do
> 'svn commit', any intermediate change in the working copy should not
> be reflected. Only the final state of the working copy compared to
> the previous state in the repository should be reflected in the
> commit.
>
> With that in mind, I don't imagine it's hard to define what the
> correct copy-from should be. Or is it?
Thats also my view :-)
I cannot speak for others, but my impression was that
this was also the agreement after this discussion.
>>Especially I think that the scenario I described in
>>http://svn.haxx.se/dev/archive-2005-01/0358.shtml
>>is a good reason for supporting it.
>
>
> I don't think so, the whole premise of the scenario is false.
> TortoiseSVN supports moving foo/foo.cpp -> tau/tau.cpp just fine.
> Just right-click foo.cpp, select "Rename..." then enter "../tau/tau.cpp".
Ups, I didn't know that!
But nevertheless, the scenario remains valid.
(The only thing which changes is that you can use TSVN for all these steps.)
Note that this scenario is just a sample for renaming a file
in a moved folder as you mentioned above.
Cheers,
Folker
> (The menu item should probably be renamed to "Move/Rename ..." to
> lessen confusion.)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sun Dec 25 00:24:52 2005