Re: svn commit: r17849 - branches/1.3.x

Hi,

In <20051219165145.GA2470@lorenz.farside.org.uk>
  "Re: svn commit: r17849 - branches/1.3.x" on Mon, 19 Dec 2005 16:51:45 +0000,
  Malcolm Rowe <malcolm-svn-dev@farside.org.uk> wrote:

> On Tue, Dec 20, 2005 at 01:02:05AM +0900, Kouhei Sutou wrote:
> > > * STATUS: Nominate r17795 and r17811.
> >
> > I have two concens.
> >
> > 1. Should I nominate this into 1.3.1 section?
> >
>
> Looks like a pretty complex change; anyone hitting this problem can work
> around it by creating a new Svn::Client::Context object per-call, right?

Yes.

> So I'd say it's 1.3.1 material rather than 1.3.0, even though the change
> _is_ limited to the Ruby bindings only. I'm not particularly wedded to
> that opinion, though.

Thank you for your advice. I move this item to 1.3.1 section.

> > 2. This revision causes conflict:
> >
> > Should I make a branch for this merge?
> >
>
> Even though it's a trivial conflict, I'd say yes: making a branch is
> cheap, and it allows anyone to merge or test the change with confidence.

I see. I did so.

Regards,

--
kou
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org