[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: svn commit: r17849 - branches/1.3.x

From: Malcolm Rowe <malcolm-svn-dev_at_farside.org.uk>
Date: 2005-12-19 17:51:45 CET

On Tue, Dec 20, 2005 at 01:02:05AM +0900, Kouhei Sutou wrote:
> > * STATUS: Nominate r17795 and r17811.
> I have two concens.
> 1. Should I nominate this into 1.3.1 section?

Looks like a pretty complex change; anyone hitting this problem can work
around it by creating a new Svn::Client::Context object per-call, right?
And the Ruby bindings are still quite usable even with this bug.

So I'd say it's 1.3.1 material rather than 1.3.0, even though the change
_is_ limited to the Ruby bindings only. I'm not particularly wedded to
that opinion, though.

> 2. This revision causes conflict:
> Should I make a branch for this merge?

Even though it's a trivial conflict, I'd say yes: making a branch is
cheap, and it allows anyone to merge or test the change with confidence.


To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Mon Dec 19 18:20:23 2005

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.