Re: Fixed issue #1456, can this get into 1.3.0?
On Sun, 18 Dec 2005, David Anderson wrote:
> David Summers wrote:
> > Is this serious enough to put in to 1.3.0 or should it just go into the
> > normal bug fixes for 1.3.1?
> My feel is that if people have lived with it for so long, and if it is not
> critical (no dataloss, no security hole etc.), it should just go on the roster
> for 1.3.1 . Unless there is a very strong feeling to the opposite.
I too would like to see 1.3.0 finalized. I've nothing against a
subsequent, quick 1.3.1 release.
Received on Tue Dec 20 01:10:18 2005
- application/pgp-signature attachment: stored
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev