[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Multiple access filess when using SVNParentPath

From: Ivan Zhakov <chemodax_at_gmail.com>
Date: 2005-11-29 09:05:46 CET

On 11/29/05, Carlos Alberto Costa Beppler <beppler@gmail.com> wrote:
> Because different people will have access to modify the policy and I
> can not give them rights to modify only parts of the file.
In my company I use Apache module mod_macro and repository
configuration take one line (Use SvnRepos test-repo). Also I place
configuration for each repos in separate file to easy detaching for
admin operations.

> On 11/28/05, Ben Collins-Sussman <sussman@red-bean.com> wrote:
> > On 11/28/05, Carlos Alberto Costa Beppler <beppler@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > +1 for a new feature where I can specify that the AuthzSVNAccessFile
> > > is a relative path to the repository repository location (using the
> > > conf directory as base by example).
> > >
> > > This can be very useful when using SVNParentPath and delegating the
> > > administration of the access control.
> > >
> > > To not break the compability with existing configuration this could be
> > > enabled by adding a new command to mod_authz_svn like
> > > "AuthzSVNRelativePath" or something like this.
> > >
> >
> > I don't understand, why do you want separate authz-policy files for
> > separate repositories, when you can already control access to *all* of
> > them with a single policy file?
> >
>

--
Ivan Zhakov
Received on Tue Nov 29 09:07:42 2005

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.